This readme file was generated on 2025-01-13 by Amy Clark

-------------------
GENERAL INFORMATION
-------------------

Title of Dataset: Supplemental data from: Reframing experiences of caregiving through a public health lens: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Author Contact Information (Name, Institution, Email, ORCID)

	Principal Investigator: Megan Shepherd-Banigan
	Institution: Duke University
	Email: mes86@duke.edu
	ORCID: 0000-0002-4020-8936

	Associate or Co-investigator: Karen M. Goldstein
	Institution: Duke University
	Email:karen.goldstein@duke.edu
	ORCID: 0000-0003-4419-5869

	Alternate Contact(s):

Date of data collection 2010-0101 - 2024-0501 

Geographic location of data collection (if applicable): Durham, North Carolina

Funding and grant numbers (if applicable): Funding from the Rosalynn Carter Institute for Caregivers

--------------------
DATA & FILE OVERVIEW
--------------------

File list:
1. Supplemental Materials, including:
	A1. Search Strategies
	A2. Included Studies Characteristics
	A3. CERQual (expanded)
	A4. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Risk of Bias
	A5. Study-level characteristics extraction template
	A6. Data collection codebook


--------------------------
METHODOLOGICAL INFORMATION
--------------------------

Description of methods used for collection/generation of data: 
Detailed methods for collection/generation of this data can be found in the accompanying manuscript:
Shepherd-Banigan M, McFatrich M, Namestnik A, Lucas N, Coban M, Kent EE, Shapiro A, Clark AG, Gierisch JM, Tan KR, Cantrell S, Goldstein KM. Reframing experiences of caregiving through a public health lens: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Accepted for publication in the International Journal of Care and Caring (January, 2025).

For additional information: PROSPERO database (CRD42022357734)


--------------------------
DATA-SPECIFIC INFORMATION 
--------------------------

This file includes supplemental data for the above-referenced publication, including:
A1. Search databases, definitions, dates, and details for the queries used to collect articles meeting study criteria.
A2. Study-level characteristics for included studies. Author, publication year, care recipient setting, study sample, condition focus, and stated aims were extracted directly from the publication. The richness score and sampling bucket were assigned by the study team.
A3. Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) results were generated by the study team using the method of Lewin et al, 2015.
A4. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was used to appraise each study in terms of validity of study results per Long et al, 2020. CASP reviews were performed by one qualitative analyst on the study team, and overread by a second reviewer. Discrepancies were resolved through consensus or input from a third reviewer.
A5. Template of the study-level characteristics that were extracted for each qualifying manuscript
A6. Data Collection codebook: This framework contained both deductive and inductive codes was developed by the lead study analyst and edited iteratively amongst the study team. 


-------------------------
USE and ACCESS INFORMATION
--------------------------

Data License: CC0

Other Rights Information: 

To cite the data: Shepherd-Banigan, M., McFatrich, M., Namestnik, A., Lucas, N., Coban, M., Kent, E. E., Shapiro, A., Clark, A. G., Gierisch, J. M., Tan, K. R., Cantrell, S., & Goldstein, K. M. (2025). Supplemental data from: Reframing experiences of caregiving through a public health lens: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Duke Research Data Repository. https://doi.org/10.7924/r4rj4ph4v.